Contribuciones de las revisiones sistemáticas y los metaanálisis en la educación, la investigación y la práctica de la Enfermería

Wilson Cañón-Montañez; Alba Luz Rodríguez-Acelas

doi:10.5294/aqui.2021.21.4.3

Authors

Wilson Cañón-Montañez Author Universidad de Antioquia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-5342
Alba Luz Rodríguez-Acelas Author Universidad de Antioquia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-3522

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2021.21.4.3

Keywords:

Systematic review, meta-analysis, Nursing education, evidence-based practice, Nursing research

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are helpful methodological alternatives that combine, discuss, and assess the quality of the best available evidence through adequate and exhaustive searches of the literature. In the last decade, there has been an increase in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nursing research. This article intends to reflect on the contributions of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to nursing education, research, and practice. Synthesizing the evidence through high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses adds to the disciplinary development of nursing; therefore, students and professionals in the field should be encouraged to employ these methodological tools in education and research and implement the results of these methods in clinical practice for making better decisions regarding the individual needs of patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Manterola C, Astudillo P, Arias E, Claros N, Grupo MINCIR (Metodología e Investigación en Cirugía). Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Qué se debe saber acerca de ellas. Cir Esp. 2013;91(3):149-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.07.009

García-Perdomo HA. Conceptos fundamentales de las revisiones sistemáticas/metaanálisis. Urol Colomb. 2015;24(1):28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.03.005

Olsson C, Ringnér A, Borglin G. Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing – ‘Hobson’s choice’? Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(2):102-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.01.005

Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25(1):12-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278702025001003

Marín F, Sánchez J, López JA. El metaanálisis en el ámbito de las Ciencias de la Salud: una metodología imprescindible para la eficiente acumulación del conocimiento. Fisioterapia. 2009;31(3):107-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ft.2009.02.002

Manterola C, Asenjo-Lobos C, Otzen T. Jerarquización de la evidencia. Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación de uso actual. Rev Chil Infectol. 2014;31(6):705-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182014000600011

Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. BMJ Evidence-Based Med. 2016;21(4):125-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401

Guirao Goris SJA. Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene. 2015;9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1988-348X2015000200002

Glass GV. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educ Res. 1976;5(10):3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1174772

Akobeng AK. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis. BMJ Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(8):845-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.058230

García J, Rodríguez JL, Subirana M. Revisiones sistemáticas de la evidencia científica: algunos apuntes prácticos. Enferm Clínica. 2003;13(3):159-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-8621(03)73799-1

McNamara ER, Scales CD. Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based clinical practice. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):520-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.91445

Cañon-Montañez W, Durán Niño EY, Hernández Beltrán JA. Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia: un pilar esencial en el Currículo. Rev Cuidarte. 2010;1(1):82-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v1i1.77

Ferreira I, Urrútia G, Alonso-Coello P. Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64(8):688-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2011.03.029

Ham-Baloyi W, Jordan P. Systematic review as a research method in post-graduate nursing education. Health SA Gesondheid. 2016;21:120-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v21i0.942

Villasis-Keever MÁ, Rendón-Macías ME, García H, Miranda-Novales MG, Escamilla-Núñez A. La revisión sistemática y el metaanálisis como herramientas de apoyo para la clínica y la investigación. Rev Alerg Mex. 2020;67(1):62-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v67i1.733

Cañon-Montañez W, Duque-Cartagena T, Rodríguez-Acelas AL. Effect of Educational Interventions to Reduce Readmissions due to Heart Failure Decompensation in Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2021;39(2):e05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v39n2e05

Li C, Yin H, Zhao J, Shang B, Hu M, Zhang P, et al. Interventions to promote mental health in nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(12):2727-2741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13808

Rodríguez-Acelas AL, Almeida MA, Engelman B, Cañon-Montañez W. Risk factors for health care-associated infection in hospitalized adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(12):e149-e156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.016

Goveia P, Cañon-Montañez W, Santos DP, Lopes GW, Ma RCW, Duncan BB, et al. Lifestyle intervention for the prevention of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:a583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00583

Twigg DE, Whitehead L, Doleman G, El-Zaemey S. The impact of nurse staffing methodologies on nurse and patient outcomes: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(12):4599-4611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14909

Shin S, Park JH, Bae SH. Nurse staffing and nurse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Outlook. 2018;66(3):273-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.12.002

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. Version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from: http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Santos WM, Secoli SR, Püschel VAA. The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2885.3074

Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(1):49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5