Adaptation to High-Risk Childbearing: Extension of a Preliminary Situation-Specific Theory with Focus on Psychological State and Functional Status

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2023.23.1.8

Keywords:

Nursing theory, nursing, pregnancy, pregnancy, high-risk, functional status

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about expectant and new parents’ psychological experiences of high-risk childbearing. Objective: The paper is a report analyses of data from a Roy Adaptation Model-guided pilot study of women’s and their male partners’ adaptation to high-risk childbearing and thereby extends a preliminary situation-specific theory of adaptation to high-risk childbearing. Materials and methods: A previous paper was a comprehensive report of the results of the pilot study except for psychological state, measured by the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised. The additional data analyses reported in this paper are for effect sizes of correlations between the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised subscales and maternal and paternal functional status inventories. Results: Correlations of small (r = 0.1), medium (r = 0.3), and large (r = 0.5) effect sizes were found for the measures of psychological state and functional status for both women and their male partners except for psychological state positive affect and maternal functional status during the postpartum, and psychological state anxiety and paternal functional status during the postpartum. Conclusions: Overall, no substantial differences were found in psychological state and functional status for women and their male partners during pregnancy and the postpartum. The findings of this secondary data analysis constitute an extension of the preliminary situation-specific theory reported in a previously published paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fawcett J, Tulman L. Adaptation to high-risk childbearing: A preliminary situation-specific theory. Aquichan. 2018;18(4):407-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2018.18.4.3

Roy C. The Roy Adaptation Model (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2009.

Zuckerman M, Lubin B. Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist - Revised. San Diego, CA: Edits, 1985.

Tulman L, Higgins K, Fawcett J, Nunno C, Vansickel C, Haas MB, Speca MM. The Inventory of Functional Status-Antepartum Period: Development and testing. J Nurs-Midwif. 1991;36(2):117-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(91)90061-S

Fawcett J, Tulman L, Myers S. Development of the Inventory of Functional Status after Childbirth. J Nurs Midwif. 1988;33(6):252-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(88)90080-8

Tulman L, Fawcett J, Weiss M. The Inventory of Functional Status-Fathers: Development and psychometric testing. J Nurs Midwif. 1993;38(5):276-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(93)90106-Q

Lubin B, Zuckerman M, Hanson P, Armstrong T, Rinck C, Sever M. Reliability and validity of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist - Revised. J Psychopath Behav Assess. 1985;8(2):103-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00963575

Fawcett J, York R. Spouses’ physical and psychological symptoms during pregnancy and the postpartum. Nurs Res. 1986;35(3):144-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198605000-00009

Cohen J. A power primer. Psych Bull. 1992;112(1):155-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

Maloni JA, Park S, Anthony MK, Musil CM. Measurement of antepartum depressive symptoms during high-risk pregnancy. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28(1):16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20051

McKee MD, Cunningham M, Jankowski KRB, Zayas L. Health- related functional status in pregnancy: Relationship to depression and social support in a multi-ethnic population. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(6):988-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01377-1

McVeigh C. Anxiety and functional status after childbirth. Aust Coll Midwives Inc J. 2000;13(1):14-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1031-170X(00)80036-7

Posmontier B. Functional status outcomes in mothers with and without postpartum depression. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2008;53(4):310–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.02.016

Barkin JL, Wisner KL, Bromberger JT, Beach SR, Wisniewski SR. Factors associated with postpartum maternal functioning in women with positive screens for depression. J Women’s Health. 2016;25(7):707–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5296

Barkin JL, McKeever A, Lian B, Wisniewski SR. Correlates of Postpartum Maternal Functioning in a Low-Income Obstetric Population. J Am Psych Nurs Assoc. 2017;23(2):149–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390317696783

Sevil Ü, Ozkan S. Fathers’ functional status during pregnancy and the early postnatal period. Midwifery. 2009;25(6):665–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.12.001

McVeigh C, St. John W, Cameron C. Fathers’ functional status six weeks following the birth of a baby: a Queensland study. Aust Midwifery, 2005;18(1):25–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1448-8272(05)80016-1

Downloads

Published

2023-03-09

How to Cite

Fawcett, J., Tulman, L., & Morgan, J. (2023). Adaptation to High-Risk Childbearing: Extension of a Preliminary Situation-Specific Theory with Focus on Psychological State and Functional Status. Aquichan, 23(1), e2318. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2023.23.1.8

Issue

Section

Articles