Rasch Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Spirit at Work Scale

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2026.26.3.3

Keywords:

Nursing, occupational health, psychometrics, validation study, spirituality

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults. Preoperative nursing interventions can improve surgical outcomes by promoting functional recovery and reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. To date, evidence regarding the feasibility of an e-Nursing preoperative intervention on older adults awaiting cardiac surgery is scarce. Objectives: To test the feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative e-Nursing intervention for older adults awaiting elective cardiac surgery, focusing on postoperative complications, length of stay, and health literacy outcomes. Materials and Methods: A single-group cohort feasibility study was conducted in a cardiothoracic department in northern Portugal. Participants aged ≥ 65 years scheduled for elective cardiac surgery received an in-person session with a rehabilitation nurse, including breathing and mobility exercises, followed by weekly remote follow-up until surgery. Data were collected at baseline and hospital discharge using validated instruments for quality of life (EQ-5D), functional status (Barthel and Lawton indexes), health literacy (HLS-EU), and exercise capacity (6-minute walk test). Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed with SPSS v28. Results: Thirty participants (mean age 74 years) completed the program, with high adherence (96.7 %). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 13% of participants, and the mean hospital stay was 7.2 days. Functional and health literacy scores showed slight, non-significant improvements. The intervention was well accepted by participants and healthcare staff. Conclusions: The e-Nursing preoperative program was feasible and acceptable for older adults awaiting cardiac surgery. Findings support the design of a future randomized trial to evaluate its effectiveness in improving recovery and reducing postoperative complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Koenig HG, Carey LB. Religion, spirituality and health research: Warning of contaminated scales. J Relig Health. 2024;63(5):3729-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02112-6

Carey LB, Koenig HG, Hill T, Drummond D, Gabbay E, Cohen J, Aiken C, Carey JR. Spirituality, mental health, and COVID-19. J Relig Health. 2024;63(1):1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02000-z

Carey LB, Cohen J, Drummond D, Aiken C, Koenig HG, Hill T et al. Nurses, clergy, chaplains, Parkinson’s disease, workplace religiosity, women’s health and family issues. J Relig Health. 2024;63(3):1705-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02047-y

Dominguez LJ, Veronese N, Barbagallo M. The link between spirituality and longevity. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024;36(1):32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02684-5

Silva Filho JAD, Silva HEOD, Oliveira JL, Silva CF, Torres GMC, Pinto AGA. Religiosity and spirituality in mental health: Nurses’ training, knowledge and practices. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021; 26(supl. 3):e20200345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0345

Dike CC, Briz L, Fadus M, Martinez R, May C, Milone R et al. Religion, spirituality, and ethics in psychiatric practice. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022; 210(8):557-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001505

Victor CGP, Treschuk J V. Critical literature review on the definition clarity of the concept of faith, religion, and spirituality. J Holist Nurs. 2020;38(1):107-13. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858879

Kinjerski VM, Skrypnek BJ. Defining spirit at work: Finding common ground. J Organ Change Manag. 2004;17(1):26-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410511288

Roman N V, Mthembu TG, Hoosen M. Spiritual care — ‘A deeper immunity’ — A response to Covid-19 pandemic. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2456

Zeladita-Huaman JA, Cuba-Sancho JM, Martina-Chávez MB, Zegarra Chapoñan R, Castillo-Parra H. Religion and professional experience: Are they predictors of nurses’ spiritual intelligence? Cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2024;77(6):e20240217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0217

Shrestha AK, Jena LK. Interactive effects of workplace spirituality and psychological capital on employee negativity. Management and Labour Studies. 2020;46(1):59-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X20962994

Kinjerski V, Skrypnek BJ. Measuring the intangible: Development of the spirit at work scale. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2006;2006(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.22898605

Kinjerski V, Skrypnek BJ. Four paths to spirit at work: Journeys of personal meaning, fulfillment, well-being, and transcendence through work. Career Dev Q. 2008;56(4):319-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00097.x

Do TT. How spirituality, climate and compensation affect job performance. Soc Responsib J. 2018;14(2):396-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0086

Dal Corso L, De Carlo A, Carluccio F, Colledani D, Falco A. Employee burnout and positive dimensions of well-being: A latent workplace spirituality profile analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242267

Moll T. German-language scales for spirituality at work. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion. 2020;17(3):270-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2020.1765191

Wu SM. Emotional intelligence and workplace spirituality in predicting career success of high-tech leaders. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(11):1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111009

Shah SHA, Fahlevi M, Jamshed K, Aman N, Rafiq N, Jermsittiparsert K, Aljuaid M. Sustaining the Earth: Unraveling the synergy of workplace spirituality, responsible leadership, and pro-environmental behavior in Pakistan’s SMEs. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:3075-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S413606

Kırklıkçı AB. Turkish adaptation of the spirit at work scale in production sector employees. J Relig Health. 2021;60(5):3675-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01393-5

Sode R, Chenji K, Vijayaraghavan R. Exploring workplace spirituality, mindfulness, digital technology, and psychological well-being: A complex interplay in organizational contexts. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024;251:104601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104601

Taylor EJ, Pangan JC. Should healthcare organizations promote a spiritually healthy work environment? Holist Nurs Pract. 2024;38(3):148-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000641

Rocha FLR, Jesus LC de, Santin Júnior LJ, Ribeiro IK da S, Martins BG, Oliveira SA de, et al. Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Spirit at Work Scale in nursing workers. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2025;46:e20240372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240372.en

Tesio L, Caronni A, Kumbhare D, Scarano S. Interpreting results from Rasch analysis 1. The “most likely” measures coming from the model. Disabil Rehabil.;46(3):591-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2169771

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8a ed. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning; 2018.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

Linacre JM. Category, step and threshold: definitions & disordering. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2001;15(1):794. Disponível em: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt151g.htm

Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1994;8:370-1. Disponível em: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm

Combrinck C. Is this a useful instrument? An introduction to Rasch measurement models. In: Kramer S, Laher S, Fynn A, Vuuren HHJ, editores. Online Readings in Research Methods. Joanesburgo: Psychological Society of South Africa; 2020. p. 1-54.

Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program User’s Guide. Version 5.6.0. Portland, Oregon: Winsteps.com; 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.10.3.189.52562

Smith EV, Conrad KM, Chang K, Piazza J. An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. J Nurs Meas. 2002;10(3):189-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.10.3.189.52562

Conrad KJ, Smith EV. International Conference on Objective Measurement: of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care. 2004;42(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000103527.52821.1c

Wang Y-C, Byers KL, Velozo CA. Rasch analysis of minimum data set mandated in skilled nursing facilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(9):1385-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.11.0184

Rouquette A, Hardouin JB, Vanhaesebrouck A, Sébille V, Coste J. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in composite health measurement scale: Recommendations for characterizing DIF with meaningful consequences within the Rasch model framework. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215073

Briggs DC. Interpreting and visualizing the unit of measurement in the Rasch Model. Measurement. 2019;146:961-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.035

Presidência da República (BR). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Dispõe sobre a proteção de dados pessoais e altera a Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (Marco Civil da Internet). Diário Oficial da União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2018. Seção 1:59. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm

Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Resolução n° 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova as seguintes diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos; Revoga as RES. 196/96; RES. 303/00; RES. 404/08. Diário Oficial União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2012. Seção 1:12-59. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf

Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Carta circular n.1 de 2021 da CONEP/SECNS/MS que estabelece orientações para procedimentos em pesquisas com qualquer etapa em ambiente virtual. Diário Oficial da União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2021. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/images/comissoes/conep/documentos/CARTAS/Carta_Circular_01.2021.pdf

Ünal Z, Turgut T. Organizational culture and organization based self-esteem as predictors of spirit at work. 2016;19(4):71-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2016.19.4.71

Civljak M, Stivic I, Puljak L. Secondary traumatic stress in working nurses studying part time in a bachelor or Master’s nursing program in Croatia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01691-1

Yadollahpour MH, Eydi M, Yaminfirooz M, Gholinia H, Shahrokhi S, Faramarzi M. Predictors of quality of professional life and well-being of medical residents and interns: Role of gender and workplace spirituality. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(9):e70064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70064

Rahbar Zeraati A, Eskandari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Association between personality traits and professional behavior with career adaptability in nursing and midwifery students. BMC Nurs. 2024;18;23(1):906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02595-4

Díaz MRH, Morales ZBS, Monroy AMV, Prieto ASC. Young nurses’ perceptions about their employment, working and health conditions. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024;32:e4335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7398.4335

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Júnior, L. J. S., Díaz, L. J. R., Ribeiro, I. K. da S., de Oliveira, A. C. G. M., Barreto, M. F. C., & Rossi Rocha, F. L. (2026). Rasch Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Spirit at Work Scale. Aquichan, 26(3), e2633. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2026.26.3.3

Issue

Section

Articles