El análisis de Rasch sobre la versión brasileña de la Spirit at Work Scale

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2026.26.3.3

Palabras clave:

Enfermería, salud laboral, psicometría, estudio de validación, espiritualidad

Resumen

Introducción: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares siguen siendo la principal causa de morbilidad y mortalidad entre los adulto mayores. Las intervenciones de enfermería preoperatorias pueden mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos al promocionar la recuperación funcional y reducir las complicaciones pulmonares posoperatorias. A la fecha, la evidencia frente a la factibilidad de una intervención preoperatoria en adultos mayores que esperan una cirugía cardiaca es escasa. Objetivos: Evaluar la factibilidad y aceptación de una intervención preoperatoria virtual de enfermería para adultos mayores que esperan por cirugía cardiaca electiva, con énfasis en complicaciones posoperatorias, tiempo de hospitalización y resultados de alfabetización en salud. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de factibilidad de una sola cohorte en un departamento cardiotorácico del norte de Portugal. Los participantes fueron adultos mayores de ≥ 65 años programados para cirugía electiva, quienes fueron recibidos en una sesión presencial por una enfermera de rehabilitación, que incluyó ejercicios de respiración y movilidad, y seguimiento a distancia semanal hasta la cirugía. Los datos se recolectaron al inicio del estudio y al momento del alta, usando instrumentos validados para la calidad de vida (EQ-5D), el estado funcional (Barthel and Lawton indexes), la alfabetización en salud (HLS-EU) y la capacidad de ejercicio (prueba de los 6 minutos caminando). Los análisis descriptivos e inferenciales se llevaron a cabo con el SPSS v28. Resultados: Treinta participantes (media de edad 74 años) completaron el programa, con adherencia alta (96,7 %). Hubo complicaciones pulmonares en el 13 % de los participantes, y la media de días de hospitalización fue de 7,2 días. Los puntajes de alfabetización funcional y en salud mostraron mejoras leves y no significativas. La intervención fue bien recibida por los participantes y los miembros del equipo de salud. Conclusiones: El programa preoperatorio virtual de enfermería fue factible y aceptable para los adultos mayores en espera de una cirugía cardiaca. Los resultados apoyan el diseño de una futura prueba aleatoria para evaluar su efectividad en el mejoramiento de la recuperación y la reducción de las complicaciones posoperatorias.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Koenig HG, Carey LB. Religion, spirituality and health research: Warning of contaminated scales. J Relig Health. 2024;63(5):3729-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02112-6

Carey LB, Koenig HG, Hill T, Drummond D, Gabbay E, Cohen J, Aiken C, Carey JR. Spirituality, mental health, and COVID-19. J Relig Health. 2024;63(1):1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02000-z

Carey LB, Cohen J, Drummond D, Aiken C, Koenig HG, Hill T et al. Nurses, clergy, chaplains, Parkinson’s disease, workplace religiosity, women’s health and family issues. J Relig Health. 2024;63(3):1705-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02047-y

Dominguez LJ, Veronese N, Barbagallo M. The link between spirituality and longevity. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024;36(1):32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02684-5

Silva Filho JAD, Silva HEOD, Oliveira JL, Silva CF, Torres GMC, Pinto AGA. Religiosity and spirituality in mental health: Nurses’ training, knowledge and practices. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021; 26(supl. 3):e20200345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0345

Dike CC, Briz L, Fadus M, Martinez R, May C, Milone R et al. Religion, spirituality, and ethics in psychiatric practice. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022; 210(8):557-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001505

Victor CGP, Treschuk J V. Critical literature review on the definition clarity of the concept of faith, religion, and spirituality. J Holist Nurs. 2020;38(1):107-13. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858879

Kinjerski VM, Skrypnek BJ. Defining spirit at work: Finding common ground. J Organ Change Manag. 2004;17(1):26-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410511288

Roman N V, Mthembu TG, Hoosen M. Spiritual care — ‘A deeper immunity’ — A response to Covid-19 pandemic. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2456

Zeladita-Huaman JA, Cuba-Sancho JM, Martina-Chávez MB, Zegarra Chapoñan R, Castillo-Parra H. Religion and professional experience: Are they predictors of nurses’ spiritual intelligence? Cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2024;77(6):e20240217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0217

Shrestha AK, Jena LK. Interactive effects of workplace spirituality and psychological capital on employee negativity. Management and Labour Studies. 2020;46(1):59-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X20962994

Kinjerski V, Skrypnek BJ. Measuring the intangible: Development of the spirit at work scale. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2006;2006(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.22898605

Kinjerski V, Skrypnek BJ. Four paths to spirit at work: Journeys of personal meaning, fulfillment, well-being, and transcendence through work. Career Dev Q. 2008;56(4):319-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00097.x

Do TT. How spirituality, climate and compensation affect job performance. Soc Responsib J. 2018;14(2):396-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0086

Dal Corso L, De Carlo A, Carluccio F, Colledani D, Falco A. Employee burnout and positive dimensions of well-being: A latent workplace spirituality profile analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242267

Moll T. German-language scales for spirituality at work. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion. 2020;17(3):270-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2020.1765191

Wu SM. Emotional intelligence and workplace spirituality in predicting career success of high-tech leaders. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(11):1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111009

Shah SHA, Fahlevi M, Jamshed K, Aman N, Rafiq N, Jermsittiparsert K, Aljuaid M. Sustaining the Earth: Unraveling the synergy of workplace spirituality, responsible leadership, and pro-environmental behavior in Pakistan’s SMEs. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:3075-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S413606

Kırklıkçı AB. Turkish adaptation of the spirit at work scale in production sector employees. J Relig Health. 2021;60(5):3675-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01393-5

Sode R, Chenji K, Vijayaraghavan R. Exploring workplace spirituality, mindfulness, digital technology, and psychological well-being: A complex interplay in organizational contexts. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024;251:104601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104601

Taylor EJ, Pangan JC. Should healthcare organizations promote a spiritually healthy work environment? Holist Nurs Pract. 2024;38(3):148-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000641

Rocha FLR, Jesus LC de, Santin Júnior LJ, Ribeiro IK da S, Martins BG, Oliveira SA de, et al. Validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Spirit at Work Scale in nursing workers. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2025;46:e20240372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240372.en

Tesio L, Caronni A, Kumbhare D, Scarano S. Interpreting results from Rasch analysis 1. The “most likely” measures coming from the model. Disabil Rehabil.;46(3):591-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2169771

Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8a ed. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning; 2018.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

Linacre JM. Category, step and threshold: definitions & disordering. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2001;15(1):794. Disponível em: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt151g.htm

Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1994;8:370-1. Disponível em: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm

Combrinck C. Is this a useful instrument? An introduction to Rasch measurement models. In: Kramer S, Laher S, Fynn A, Vuuren HHJ, editores. Online Readings in Research Methods. Joanesburgo: Psychological Society of South Africa; 2020. p. 1-54.

Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program User’s Guide. Version 5.6.0. Portland, Oregon: Winsteps.com; 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.10.3.189.52562

Smith EV, Conrad KM, Chang K, Piazza J. An introduction to Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. J Nurs Meas. 2002;10(3):189-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.10.3.189.52562

Conrad KJ, Smith EV. International Conference on Objective Measurement: of Rasch analysis in health care. Med Care. 2004;42(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000103527.52821.1c

Wang Y-C, Byers KL, Velozo CA. Rasch analysis of minimum data set mandated in skilled nursing facilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(9):1385-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.11.0184

Rouquette A, Hardouin JB, Vanhaesebrouck A, Sébille V, Coste J. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in composite health measurement scale: Recommendations for characterizing DIF with meaningful consequences within the Rasch model framework. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215073

Briggs DC. Interpreting and visualizing the unit of measurement in the Rasch Model. Measurement. 2019;146:961-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.035

Presidência da República (BR). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Dispõe sobre a proteção de dados pessoais e altera a Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (Marco Civil da Internet). Diário Oficial da União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2018. Seção 1:59. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm

Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Resolução n° 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova as seguintes diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos; Revoga as RES. 196/96; RES. 303/00; RES. 404/08. Diário Oficial União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2012. Seção 1:12-59. Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf

Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Carta circular n.1 de 2021 da CONEP/SECNS/MS que estabelece orientações para procedimentos em pesquisas com qualquer etapa em ambiente virtual. Diário Oficial da União [internet]. Brasília, DF; 2021. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/images/comissoes/conep/documentos/CARTAS/Carta_Circular_01.2021.pdf

Ünal Z, Turgut T. Organizational culture and organization based self-esteem as predictors of spirit at work. 2016;19(4):71-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2016.19.4.71

Civljak M, Stivic I, Puljak L. Secondary traumatic stress in working nurses studying part time in a bachelor or Master’s nursing program in Croatia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01691-1

Yadollahpour MH, Eydi M, Yaminfirooz M, Gholinia H, Shahrokhi S, Faramarzi M. Predictors of quality of professional life and well-being of medical residents and interns: Role of gender and workplace spirituality. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(9):e70064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70064

Rahbar Zeraati A, Eskandari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Association between personality traits and professional behavior with career adaptability in nursing and midwifery students. BMC Nurs. 2024;18;23(1):906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02595-4

Díaz MRH, Morales ZBS, Monroy AMV, Prieto ASC. Young nurses’ perceptions about their employment, working and health conditions. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024;32:e4335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7398.4335

Publicado

2026-09-22

Cómo citar

Júnior, L. J. S., Díaz, L. J. R., Ribeiro, I. K. da S., de Oliveira, A. C. G. M., Barreto, M. F. C., & Rossi Rocha, F. L. (2026). El análisis de Rasch sobre la versión brasileña de la Spirit at Work Scale. Aquichan, 26(3), e2633. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2026.26.3.3

Número

Sección

Artículos

Datos de los fondos