Pain Quality Cards: Cultural Adaptation and Evidence of Validity in Children
Keywords:
Child, dimension of pain, validation studies, pediatric nursing, wounds and injuriesAbstract
Objective: Evaluate cultural adaptation and find evidence of the validity of pain quality cards as a tool. Materials and method: This is a methodological study with test validation. Translation, retranslation, a panel of experts, a review by school-age children, and a pilot test of pain quality cards were used to adapt and validate the content. Moreover, the validity of the external criterion was evaluated with ninety school-aged children who were hospitalized and had wounds or injuries. This research was conducted between January and February 2015. Results: The tool was translated into Spanish then retranslated into Portuguese. The evaluation by the panel of experts established a content validity index of 0.92. In response to the review carried out by the children, changes were made to the descriptors of seven cards, according to their suggestions. The pilot study showed seventeen cards had semantic clarity for more than 90% of children. Regarding the evidence based on the external criterion, the variables of medical diagnosis, wound type, wound infection and pain intensity showed significant results (p <0.05). Conclusions: The pain quality cards were culturally adapted and showed evidence of validity based on content and the external criterion.Downloads
References
Groenewald CB, Rabbitts JA, Schroeder DR, Harrison TE. Prevalence of moderate – severe pain in hospitalized children.
Pediatr Anesth. 2012;22(6):661-8.
Kozlowski LJ, Kost-byerly S, Colantuoni E, Thompson CB, Vasquenza KJ, Rothman SK, et al. Pain prevalence, intensity,
assessment and management in a hospitalized pediatric population. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(1):22-35.
Woo K, Sibbald G, Fogh K, Glynn C, Krasner D, Leaper D, et al. Assessment and management of persistent (chronic) and
total wound pain. Int Wound J. 2008;5(2):205-15. Recuperado de: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18494626
Gardner SE, Abbott LI, Fiala CA, Rakel BA. Factors associated with high pain intensity during wound care procedures: A
model. Wound Repair Regen. 2017;25(4):558-63.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Directrices de la OMS sobre el tratamiento farmacológico del dolor persistente
en niños con enfermedades médicas. 2012 [visitado 2018 ene 08]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/medicines/
areas/quality_safety/3PedPainGLs_coverspanish.pdf
Jonssona C, Holmstenb A, Dahlstrijm L, Jonssod K. Background pain in burn patients: Routine measurement and recording
of pain intensity in a burn unit. Burns. 1998;24:448-54.
Damasceno A, Almeida P, Barroso M. Dor em crianças vítimas de queimaduras - estudo epidemiológico. Online Brazilian
J Nurs. 2007;6(2).
Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens BJ. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability
and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain.
;125:143-57.
Rossato LM, Magaldi F. Instrumentos multidimensionales aplicação dos cartões das qualidades da dor em crianças. Rev
Latinoam Enferm. 2006;14(5).
Gracely RH. Pain language and evaluation. Pain. 2016;157(7):1369-72.
Andrade L, Neves R. Pain as the 5th Vital Sign: Assessment and reassessment in a pediatric oncology unit. Rev Soc Bras
Enferm Ped. 2013;13(2):95-104.
Guedes DMB, Rossato LM, Sposito NPB, Lima D, Santos B, Meireles E. Avaliação da dor em crianças hospitalizadas. Rev
Soc Bras Enferm Ped. 2016;16(2):68-74.
Rossato LM, Ebner C, Nascimento L, Damião E, Rocha P, Guedes D, et al. Facilidades e dificuldades identificadas pelas
enfermeiras pediatras na aplicação dos “cartões de qualidade da dor”. Saúde em Rev. 2015;15(40):3-14.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report
measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
Borsa JC, Damásio B, Bandeira D. Adaptação e Validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações.
Paidéia. 2012;22(53):423-32.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi M. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASK
Outcome measures; 2007. p. 1-45.
Martins G. Sobre confiabilidade e validade. Rev Bras Gest Negocios. 2006;8(20):1-12.
Pasquali L. Validade dos testes psicológicos: será possível reencontrar o caminho? Psicol Teor e Pesqui. 2007;23(especial):
-107.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Análise Multivariada dos dados. 6a. ed. Pearson; 2009.
Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas.
Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16(7):3061-8.
Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa Statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys
Ther. 2005;85(3):257-68.
Gjersing L, Caplehorn JRM, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and
statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:13.
Ohrbach R, Bjorner J, Metric Q, Jezewski M, John MT, Lobbezoo F. Guidelines for establishing cultural equivalency of
instruments. New York: University of Bufalo; 2013.
Pasquali L. Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010.
Siegler RS. Continuity and change in the field of cognitive development and in the perspectives of one cognitive developmentalist.
Child Dev Perspect. 2016;10(2):128-33.
Barrouillet P. Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Dev Rev. 2015;38:1-12.
Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Nociception, pain, negative moods, and behavior selection. Neuron. 2015;87(3):474-91.
Jacob E, Mack AK, Savedra M, Cleve L Van, Wilkie DJ. Adolescent pediatric pain tool for multidimensional measurement
of pain in children and adolescents. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(3):694-706.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
