Validation of a Scale on Structure Indicators in the Operating Room: Contributions to Nursing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2019.19.1.7Keywords:
Health evaluation, operating rooms, quality of health care, validation studiesAbstract
Validación de una escala sobre indicadores de estructura en el bloque operatorio: contribución para la enfermería
Validação de uma escala sobre indicadores de estrutura no bloco operatório: contributos para a enfermagem
Objective: Measuring instruments play, namely, an important role in the safety and quality of care. The aim of this study consists in validating a scale conceived to evaluate the structure of the operating room (OR). Materials and Methods: Validation and psychometric evaluation were carried out of the instrument. The sample was comprised of 1019 professionals working in the OR for at least two years in 71 Portuguese hospitals; the research was conducted in 2017. Results: The results obtained in the reliability and validity tests reveal good internal consistency. The 28 items of the scale, and after the principal components analysis, were grouped into seven dimensions: “Environment and equipment”, “Resources for quality and safety”, “Circuits in the operating room”, “Facilities and operating requirements”, “Training and praxis in the operating room”, “Continuity in nursing care”, and “Specificities of professional groups”. Conclusion: The psychometric study allows us to state that the scale of structure indicators in the operating room (SIOR) is a reliable and valid instrument. Its use will permit evaluating and monitoring the structural conditions of the ORs.
To reference this article / Para citar este artículo / Para citar este artigo
Gomes JA, Martins MM, Trochin D, Fernandes CS . Validation of a Scale on Structure Indicators in the Operating Room: Contributions to Nursing. Aquichan 2019; 19(1): e1917. DOI: 10.5294/aqui.2019.19.1.7
Received: 16/08/2018
Approved: 10/12/2018
Downloads
References
Gomes JA, Martins MM, Fernandes CS. Instrumentos para avaliar a qualidade e segurança no bloco operatório ― revisão integrativa. Cogitare Enfermagem. 2016; 21(5). DOI: 10.5380/ce.v21i5.45640
Gomes JA, Martins MM, Tronchin D, Fernandes CS. A técnica de grupo focal na validação de conteúdo para avaliação da qualidade assistencial em bloco operatório. Brazilian Journal of Surgery and Clinical Research. 2017; 21(2): 88-93. Available from: https://www.mastereditora.com.br/periodico/20180103_165408.pdf
Anderson C, Talsma A. Characterizing the structure of operating room staffing using social network analysis. Nursing Research. 2011; 60(6): 378-85. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182337d97
Lin Q, Liu L, Liu H, Wang D. Integrating hierarchical balanced scorecard with fuzzy linguistic for evaluating operating room performance in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013; 40(6): 1917-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.007
Cima R, Brown M, Hebl J, Moore R, Rogers J, Deschamps C, et al. Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011; 213(1): 83-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.009
Gabriel R, Gimlich R, Ehrenfeld J, Urman R. Operating room metrics score card-creating a prototype for individualized feedback. Journal of Medical Systems. 2014; 38(11): 144. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-014-0144-8
Fernandes HMLG, Peniche ACG. Percepção da equipe de enfermagem do centro cirúrgico acerca da acreditação hospitalar em um hospital universitário. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2015; 49(spe): 22-8. DOI: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000700004
Costa Jr AS, Leão LEV, de Novais MAP, Zucchi P. An assessment of the quality indicators of operative and non-operative times in a public university hospital. Einstein. 2015; 13(4): 594-99. DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082015GS3289
Aweerakkody R, Cheshire N, Riga C, Lear R, Hamady M, Bicknell C, et al. Surgical technology and operating-room safety failures: a systematic review of quantitative studies. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013; 22(9): 710-18. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001778
Joseph A, Bayramzadeh S, Zamani Z, Rostenberg B. Safety, Performance, and Satisfaction Outcomes in the Operating Room: A Literature Review. Herd. 2018; 11(2): 137-50. DOI: 10.1177/1937586717705107
Zhao P, Li Y, Li Z, Jia P, Zhang L, Zhang M. Use of patient safety culture instruments in operating rooms: a systematic literature review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2017; 10(2): 145-51. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12255
Wu Q, Huang L, Xing M, Feng Z, Shao L, Shao R, et al. Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for the operating room: a cross-sectional Delphi survey conducted in China. Australian Critical Care. 2017; 30(1): 44-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.04.003
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research. 2010; 19: 539-49. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Gärtner F, Bomhof-Roordink H, Smith I, Scholl I, Stiggelbout A, Pieterse A. The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191747
Cunha CM, Neto OP, Stackflethc R. Principais métodos de avaliação psicométrica da confiabilidade de instrumentos de medida. Revista de Atenção à Saúde. 2016; 14(49): 98-103. DOI: 10.13037/ras.vol14n49.3671
Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gonçalves N, Romanoski PJ. Propriedades psicométricas de instrumentos de medidas: bases conceituais e métodos de avaliação. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem. 2017; 26(4): e1600017. DOI: 10.1590/0104-07072017001600017
Souza AC, Alexandre NC, Guirardello E. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2017; 26(3): 649-59. DOI: 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300022
Gormley T, Markel T, Jones H, Greeley D, Ostojic J, Wagner J, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of different air change rates in an operating room environment. American Journal of Infection Control. 2017; 45(12): 1318-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.07.024
PR Newswire. Operating Room (OR) Equipment Market 2016 to 2020. New Research Report. Available at WiseGuyReports.com. PR Newswire US [Internet]. 2016 Apr 7 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bwh&AN=201604071652PR.NEWS.USPR.MN65878&lang=pt-br&site=ehost-live
Wahr J, Abernathy J. Environmental hygiene in the operating room: cleanliness, godliness, and reality. International Anesthesiology Clinics. 2013; 51(1): 93-104. DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31827da44b
Graafland M, Schraagen J, Boermeester M, Bemelman W, Schijven M. Training situational awareness to reduce surgical errors in the operating room. The British Journal of Surgery. 2015; 102(1): 16-23. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9643
Gürsoy A, Candaş B, Güner S, Yılmaz S. Preoperative stress: an operating room nurse intervention assessment. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2016; 31(6): 495-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.08.011
Di Martinelly C, Baptiste P, Maknoon M. An assessment of the integration of nurse timetable changes with operating room planning and scheduling. International Journal of Production Research. 2014; 52(24): 7239-50. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.916827
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
